Craig Wright must pay $516K to pursue sue against Kraken, Coinbase

Australian computer scientist Craig Wright, who claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious founder of Bitcoin (BTC), must pay $516,000 in legal costs to pursue claims against crypto exchanges Coinbase and Kraken. 

James Mellor, the presiding judge at the England and Wales High Court, issued a judgment on July 27, expressing doubts about Wright’s ability to fund the legal expenses, pointing to inconsistent statements about his financial position.

The case revolves around trademark infringement, with Wright asserting that he owns the rights to the name “Bitcoin.” He argues that the exchanges cannot use the term for assets like BTC and Bitcoin Cash (BCH), which he believes deviates from his original system.

You might also like: Bitcoin cash price rises as Binance.US addresses recent concerns

The preliminary judgment required Wright’s company, Wright International Investments Ltd (WII), to provide security deposits of $323,900 and $193,000 for the legal costs of Coinbase and Kraken, respectively. However, the judge imposed a different order on Wright personally due to uncertainties about WII’s residency and business activities.

The evidence provided by Wright in response to the defendant’s application for security for costs was deemed insufficient by the judge. This raised concerns about the availability of funds to cover potential legal expenses.

The case explores complex issues such as trademark law and blockchain immutability. However, doubts about Wright’s claimed identity as Satoshi Nakamoto and his control over early Bitcoin mining rewards continue to shadow the proceedings.

Additional rulings to shape the case

Judge Mellor’s rulings have significant implications for the future of Wright’s Bitcoin trademark cases. 

He decided to stay the infringement lawsuits against Coinbase and Kraken until the resolution of a previous case, Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Craig Steven Wright, which aims to determine whether Wright is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto. 

If Wright loses that case, it could sink his trademark lawsuit against the exchanges. 

On the other hand, if Wright is affirmed as the creator of Bitcoin, his trademark cases can continue.

The judge’s latest decision places the burden on Wright to provide satisfactory evidence of his ability to pay the costs, which he failed to do, rather than on the plaintiffs to prove his funds. 

Read more: Craig Wright in trouble, US judge finds evidence of contempt
Follow Us on Google News

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FTX Wallet Drainer Relentless: Bridges Another 5,624 ETH to BTC

CertiK Alert posted on October 4 that the FTX drainer bridged another 5,624 ETH to BTC. That follows a series of notifications of multiple activities by the hacker, recently. The latest amount adds to over 30,000 ETH already bridged by the FTX wallet drainer. CertiK Alert, a platform that provides real-time alerts about crypto hacks, posted on October 4 that the FTX drainer bridged another 5,624 ETH to BTC. That follows a series of notifications about the recent resurfacing of the hacker who stole a significant amount of funds from the defunct FTX exchange. #CertiKSkynetAlert The FTX drainer has bridged another 5,624 ETH to BTC Receiving wallets: Bc1q8…m7zcy Bc1qs…fyhdy Bc1q7…3tg27https://t.co/4J3l9hyvjX — CertiK Alert (@CertiKAlert) October 4, 2023 The recent alert comes after CertiK Alert had posted about the hacker bridging up to 30,000 ETH to BTC as of October 2, 2023. Over the weekend, the crypto industry observed renewed activity on the w...
Read more

Here’s how to prevent NFT theft, according to industry professionals

Image
Professionals working in the Web3 space highlighted various tools and best practices to protect NFTs from hackers and scammers. As nonfungible tokens (NFTs) attract more users, they also capture the eyes of scammers. Bad actors in Web3 have set their sights on digital collectibles, with millions being lost through scams and various attacks.  However, according to professionals working in the Web3 space, there are multiple ways and tools to prevent being a victim of NFT theft . In addition, users can also take various actions after losing their digital collectibles to hacks. Ronghui Gu, the co-founder and CEO of blockchain Security firm CertiK, told Cointelegraph that the first and most important step is always due diligence. “Avoid clicking on suspicious links and be very careful when signing token approvals,” Gu shared. Taking it a step further, the executive shared other best practices like periodically checking and revoking unneeded permissions and segregating NFTs into differen...
Read more

Sell the rumors… Buy hack announcements? Unibot retrospective

In the aftermath of a significant security breach affecting Unibot (UNIBOT), an unexpected twist in market psychology surfaced. A leading analyst on prominent crypto analytics platform Santiment dissected the curious case of Unibot price action following a hack, challenging the old adage of “sell the rumor , buy the news.” He wrote: Panic creeps in, you start getting doubts (especially having experience multiple blowups of projects before), maybe it’s just better to sell and wait it out? Looks like many UNIBOT holders felt those kind of feelings in the recent days. On Oct. 31st, a capitulation event was observed for Unibot as long-standing coins changed hands in response to panic stemming from a cryptic tweet by the coin’s developers. The subsequent sell-off resulted in the largest transaction volume spike for Unibot, accompanied by a noticeable increase in active addresses — a movement tracked closely by Santiment’s tools. If you read any UNIBOT-rel...
Read more