Ooki DAO loses to CFTC after refusal to contest case 

DeFi margin trading platform Ooki DAO lost its suit with the CFTC earlier this month after opting to not fight back. The default judgment has limited power to establish precedent, but other DAOs and their members should still take note, legal experts say. 

The CFTC won its case against Ooki DAO in a June 8 default judgment. The court moved ahead with a default judgment because Ooki DAO refused to offer any defense or plea. 

“Appearing before the court to defend Ooki DAO would establish someone as a member of the DAO, which might imbue that person with personal liability for the DAO’s activities,” Jason Civalleri product counsel at Grayscale, said. “Apparently the DAO’s members did not want to take on this risk.” 

The CFTC filed its suit against Ooki DAO in federal court in California last September, alleging the DAO was operating an illegal trading platform by offering “leveraged and margined” commodities. 

As part of the default judgment, Ooki DAO has been ordered to cease all operations and pay a $643,542 penalty. Other DAOs should consider the outcome and the CFTC’s case against Ooki, Civalleri said. 

“The case only establishes limited precedent because it is a default judgment, but the court’s reasoning is sound,” Civalleri said. “It’s an important reminder for DAOs and their members that just because they are acting within a DAO framework does not mean legal liability cannot apply to them.”

The judgment issued this week does not hold any of Ooki’s members personally liable, but Civalleri said that the CFTC could opt to potentially charge individuals in the future. 

Typically, the structure of LLCs and similar entities mean the company’s owners and investors are not personally responsible for fees and penalties imposed on the company. 

But that’s not usually the case when it comes to DAOs, Civalleri said. 

“An individual might not recognize that participation in a DAO (possibly even by simply holding a DAO’s token) might make them personally liable if that DAO does something illegal – unless that DAO has properly registered as an entity with limited liability,” Civalleri said. “All investors should consider this risk when joining a DAO or holding DAO tokens.”

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FTX Wallet Drainer Relentless: Bridges Another 5,624 ETH to BTC

CertiK Alert posted on October 4 that the FTX drainer bridged another 5,624 ETH to BTC. That follows a series of notifications of multiple activities by the hacker, recently. The latest amount adds to over 30,000 ETH already bridged by the FTX wallet drainer. CertiK Alert, a platform that provides real-time alerts about crypto hacks, posted on October 4 that the FTX drainer bridged another 5,624 ETH to BTC. That follows a series of notifications about the recent resurfacing of the hacker who stole a significant amount of funds from the defunct FTX exchange. #CertiKSkynetAlert The FTX drainer has bridged another 5,624 ETH to BTC Receiving wallets: Bc1q8…m7zcy Bc1qs…fyhdy Bc1q7…3tg27https://t.co/4J3l9hyvjX — CertiK Alert (@CertiKAlert) October 4, 2023 The recent alert comes after CertiK Alert had posted about the hacker bridging up to 30,000 ETH to BTC as of October 2, 2023. Over the weekend, the crypto industry observed renewed activity on the w...
Read more

Here’s how to prevent NFT theft, according to industry professionals

Image
Professionals working in the Web3 space highlighted various tools and best practices to protect NFTs from hackers and scammers. As nonfungible tokens (NFTs) attract more users, they also capture the eyes of scammers. Bad actors in Web3 have set their sights on digital collectibles, with millions being lost through scams and various attacks.  However, according to professionals working in the Web3 space, there are multiple ways and tools to prevent being a victim of NFT theft . In addition, users can also take various actions after losing their digital collectibles to hacks. Ronghui Gu, the co-founder and CEO of blockchain Security firm CertiK, told Cointelegraph that the first and most important step is always due diligence. “Avoid clicking on suspicious links and be very careful when signing token approvals,” Gu shared. Taking it a step further, the executive shared other best practices like periodically checking and revoking unneeded permissions and segregating NFTs into differen...
Read more

Sell the rumors… Buy hack announcements? Unibot retrospective

In the aftermath of a significant security breach affecting Unibot (UNIBOT), an unexpected twist in market psychology surfaced. A leading analyst on prominent crypto analytics platform Santiment dissected the curious case of Unibot price action following a hack, challenging the old adage of “sell the rumor , buy the news.” He wrote: Panic creeps in, you start getting doubts (especially having experience multiple blowups of projects before), maybe it’s just better to sell and wait it out? Looks like many UNIBOT holders felt those kind of feelings in the recent days. On Oct. 31st, a capitulation event was observed for Unibot as long-standing coins changed hands in response to panic stemming from a cryptic tweet by the coin’s developers. The subsequent sell-off resulted in the largest transaction volume spike for Unibot, accompanied by a noticeable increase in active addresses — a movement tracked closely by Santiment’s tools. If you read any UNIBOT-rel...
Read more